300 H&H - THE MOST VERSATILE MAGNUM
By: C. Bekker
The 375 H&H dates back to 1912 and the British wanted a long range calibre
and designed it around the very same case, necked down to a .308 calibre
In 1935, Ben Comfort won the prestigious 1000 yard Wimbledon
Cup with his 300 H&H which led to Winchester chambering for the calibre in
It is now 80 Years later and the 300H&H is still the most practical and
useful magnum in the .300 calibre range. It offers the handloader and
hunter more versatility and benefits; for example:-
a) It is the most efficient powder burner of all the .300's.
b) It does not require a 26 inch long barrel as it uses less powder.
c) The taper of the case body and the gentle shoulder makes it a smooth & reliable feeder.
d) It is the least likely to have a sticky bolt problem when pressures
get high on a hot day.
e) Operating pressures are lower and therefore there is less strain on
the gun and case life is better.
f) Its long neck makes it easier to reload it with heavier bullets, like
200 & 220 grainers.
g) Additional and unnecessary velocity of faster magnums is more
destructive on the bullet.
h) It has lower recoil than the faster magnums as velocity gets squared
in the energy calculation.
i) Longer barrel life by virtue of lower operating temperatures -
throats get eroded.
j) More versatile with the 220 grainer for shorter ranges like in the
The only real justification of the .300 magnums is their ability to push
200 & 220 Gr bullets at adequate velocities for hunting of big game, like
Gemsbok and Kudu at long range and that makes the 300 H&H the clear winner
as its case has a longer neck which makes it easier to reload with the
heavier bullets than its rivals.
If you wish to shoot 180 Gr bullets in
your 300 H&H, you might as well stay with your 30-06 as the extra velocity
will do you no good.
A 200 grain bullet has a sectional density factor of
301 which is preferable over a 180 grain bullet which is only .271.
punch hard enough at longer ranges one needs more initial momentum -i.e.,
mass and velocity and that is why the 30-06 is falling short. Also, a 200
gr bullet has a better ballistic coefficient, mainly through its better
sectional density rather than through form, and thus retain velocity
better and the 200 gr bullet is ideal for the 300 Magnums. When the 220
grainers are used, velocity is lower and the flat trajectory is then
compromised to some degree. However, if your hunting distance is more like
200 yards, the 220 grainer with a sectional density of .331 is even better
Well, I have given ten good reasons why the 300 H&H is the top
It is really sad that Winchester stopped making this British
calibre, when they introduced their 300 Win Mag in 1963.
The main reason
being to wring out a little bit more velocity. For example, if we take
Federal ammunition we will see that the 300 Win Mag gives 2,960 fps
against the 2,880 fps of the 300 H&H with a 180 gr Nosler Partition
bullet - a mere 2.8%. The point is why shoot a 180 grainer if the we can
shoot a 200 grainer that can run at 2,800 fps in both calibres with
The 7 mm Magnums cannot shoot heavier bullets than 175 grains and
therefore fall short to compete with the 300 magnums. Bullet mass is more
important than velocity for hunting bigger game like Kudu or Eland or even
Gemsbok at long range.
Flatter shooting magnums are really of no use as the improvement is
marginal even at 300 yards - a mere 2 inches at 300 yards, at game the
size of Kudu? It is a question of at what distance you zero your rifle.
The latest and supposedly greatest 300 Magnum, is the new 300 Ultra
Remington Magnum, that shoots a 200 grainer at 3,025 fps - all
conventional bullets will fail as the forces imparted to the bullet,
forward and rotational, are way too high and thus the only reliable
hunting bullets will be premium grade bullets.
The meat hunter does not like bloodshot meat and hence impact velocity is
important so that a lot of meat does not go to waste - impact velocity
should not be higher than around 2,200 fps and thus the 300 Ultra
Remington Magnum will bruise a lot of meat when game is shot between 200
to 300 yds.
Look at this table for a comparison:- (200 gr bullet, BC =
|Velocity - fps
|Bullet Drop Z=200
|Wind Drift @ 10 mph
|300 Ultra Rem Mag
|Velocity - fps
|Bullet Drop Z=200
|Wind Drift @ 10 mph
The 300 H&H is ideal at hunting distances between 250 and 350 yards - at
350 yards the Ultra Rem Magnum is roughly doing the velocity that the 300
H&H is doing at 200 yds and it would cause more meat damage as the impact
velocity is too high and shots beyond 350 yards are less common and more
risky in terms of accuracy, bullet drop and last but not least the wind
drift all of which get progressively worse the longer the shot.
are common at 300 to 350 yds then one should rather zero the rifle at 300
yds to minimize hold over.
Hopefully, the above table will convince you to rather limit your shots to
250 yds and hence avoiding wounding your animal and a consequent long
follow up. Second shots only cause more meat damage and the adrenaline
will make the meat tough after a chase.
The vital zone area is only about
10 inches for a kudu in diameter and you have to land the bullet there or
else ...you may regret it!
Mother nature has already moved the bullet at
300 yards 8.1" and 5.9" away from where you aimed in terms of bullet drop
and wind drift.
In addition, if you can shoot a 1" group @ 100 yards, then
that becomes 3 inches out at 300 yards - that is the practical reality.
So, this inaccuracy should be added to the bullet drop and wind drift
factor - you get the picture? I have not even mentioned the fact that hot
loads, that cause more recoil, could cause the hunter to flinch.
placement is of vital importance for one shot kills.
The 300 H&H is making a strong come back in South Africa due to all the
negatives associated with the faster magnums. Generally speaking, people
that have used the 300 Win Mag with 180 Gr bullets at 2,960 fps are not
impressed - it is too fast for big game at the distances that they are
I now wish to stack the 180 grain bullet up against the 200
grainer so we can see if there is a real benefit to shoot the faster and
Let us use typical velocities for the
300 H&H in both
loads and let us use Speer Spitzer bullets of which the details are as
180 Gr 2,850 Fps BC = .462
200 Gr 2,700 Fps BC = .556
|Bullet Drop - in inches
|180 Gr Bullet
|200 Gr Bullet
|Wind Drift - in inches
|180 Gr Bullet
|200 Gr Bullet
The 200 grain bullet only drops 0.7 of an inch more than the 180 grainer
at a distance of 400 yards. Most people battle to shoot a 0.7 inch
grouping at a 100 yards! As far as wind deflection goes, we see that the
heavier bullet is superior by 1.5 inches at 400 yards.
So, in my opinion,
there is absolutely no gain to be had by shooting a 180 grain bullet at a
faster velocity, as it gets negated by the better ballistic coefficient of
the 200 grainer.
At 300 yards, there is practically no difference at all.
Sure, the 300 Remington Ultra Magnum would shoot flatter than the 300 H&H
and I would bet that most Americans would opt to shoot the 180 grainers at
3,320 fps in preference to the 200 grainers at 3,025 fps as they have been
conditioned to believe that more velocity will give them the edge -
perhaps so for distances beyond 400 yards.
300 H&H rifles are scarce and must be custom built if you want one.
believe Dakota Arms in the USA are still making the this old British
If you cannot kill your quarry with a 200 grainer at 2,700 fps
then your hunting skill need some honing or you need to take up
fly-fishing instead. In fact, my favorite load with the 200 gr bullet is
at 2,600 fps as I limit my shots to 250 yards, there is less strain on my
rifle and I make it easier for my bullets to perform as unnecessary energy
placed on the bullet is destructive on the bullet.
The gun world media conditions us to believe that we need faster and
faster magnums as the time passes by. My contention is that Remington has
now created a Mona Lisa with a moustache with their Ultra Magnum!
closing, I wish to go back in time ... it was 1939, the chill of war
already settling like a cold, damp fog over Europe when John Taylor wrote
the first lines to his book:
"It is an astonishing thing how little the average sportsman in Africa
knows about the rifles he uses. It is only a trifling exaggeration to say
that all he really does know about them, is that a bullet comes out of the
end that has a hole in it!"
Today, more than 60 years later, these famous words seems to fit the
American manufacturers as well ... as they are the ones who supply the
gullible novice hunters with their latest and greatest rifles.
Chris Bekker (firstname.lastname@example.org)